Waste Management

EPA Guidance to Commercial and Industrial Lessees for CERCLA Liability Protection for Historic Contamination

The United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) recently issued revised guidance clarifying its position that commercial and industrial tenants can protect themselves from contamination liability under the federal Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA, or "Superfund") by relying on an “all appropriate inquiry” of the ownership and uses of the property, timely performed by the landlord, or by timely performing the all appropriate inquiry themselves. Under EPA’s prior guidance, it was unclear that these statutory defenses were available to tenants. CERCLA imposes strict, joint, and several liability on designated persons, including owners and operators of facilities, where there has been a release or threatened release of hazardous substances. Although the mere execution of a lease does not necessarily impose CERCLA sec. 107 liability, tenants leasing contaminated properties may fall within the “operator” liability designation even if the contamination occurred prior to the tenant’s use of the property. Tenants are also listed in the CERCLA sec. 101(40) definition of "bona fide prospective purchaser" ("BFPP"). CERCLA provides a liability defense to BFPPs who can meet certain requirements, including the making of an "all appropriate inquiry", ordinarily a Phase I environmental site assessment, prior to purchasing or leasing the property. This defense can protect against CERCLA liability at a site that has historical environmental contamination that was not caused by the tenant. Subject to certain conditions, the BFPP defense applies even when the inquiry reveals historical environmental contamination on the property to be purchased or leased.

Under EPA’s revised guidance, a tenant can have derivative BFPP protection by relying on the landlord’s all appropriate inquiry or by performing the all appropriate inquiry itself prior to commencing operations if the landlord failed to timely undertake it or has acted in a way to invalidate this protection. The new guidance indicates how EPA will exercise its enforcement discretion under CERCLA. It is important to note that EPA may still take enforcement action against a tenant if it is potentially liable for reasons other than its status as a tenant or where the owner is not in compliance with state or federal regulatory requirements or cleanup orders.

A prospective lessee of commercial or industrial property should determine if the owner or landlord of the property timely performed an all appropriate inquiry prior to its purchase of the property, where the inquiry, purchase and lease occurred after January 11, 2002. If not, the tenant may want to consider performing a Phase I environmental site assessment prior to entering into a lease to obtain protection from CERCLA liability claims.

A link to EPA’s guidance document is here: "Revised Enforcement Guidance Regarding the Treatment of Tenants Under the CERCLA Bona Fide Prospective Purchaser Provision"

Risks of Fracking Gas Well Leases: "Homeowners and Gas Well Drilling: Boon or Bust"

Underscoring the risks of Marcellus Shale formation gas well leases that we discussed in our post of December 4, 2011 is an EcoWatch article posted yesterday by New York attorney Elisabeth Radow, "Homeowners and Gas Well Drilling: Boon or Bust."   It contains a thorough and extensive analysis of numerous issues relating to gas well drilling and leases for such activities and the risks for property owners who enter into such leases.  Accompanying the analysis are a series of photographs of actual well drilling sites by photographer J Henry Fair, best known for his Industrial Scars series, in which he "researches our world’s most egregious environmental disasters and creates images that are simultaneously stunning and horrifying". Mr. Fair’s work has been featured in national and international media and has been exhibited world wide. The article and photographs make for sobering reading and viewing for anyone who has entered into such a lease or is considering such a lease.  Property owners who may enter into such leases should be fully cognizant of the significant environmental and legal risks of these transactions.  This article provides valuable information on these issues.

The Perils of Natural Gas Well Drilling / "Fracking" Leases in Pennsylvania's Marcellus Shale

Natural Gas Hydraulic FracturingThe New York Times' exposé of the problems with natural gas/hydraulic fracturing continues with an illuminating article, "Learning Too Late of the Perils in Gas Well Leases."  As the article says, "Americans have signed millions of leases allowing companies to drill for oil and natural gas on their land in recent years. But some of these landowners — often in rural areas, and eager for quick payouts — are finding out too late what is, and what is not, in the fine print."   While some landowners have been paid significant sums under these leases, others are discovering they are paying a costly price for "permitting industrial activity in their backyard."  Problems caused by the fine print in such leases can include: (1) the refusal by the gas company to compensate for damages to water supplies, livestock or crops; (2) noise and light pollution, 24 hours/7 days a week; (3) losing control over the use of the property, as most leases grant gas companies broad rights to determine where they can cut down trees, store chemicals, build roads and drill wells; (4) industrial waste disposal on the property; (5) enduring indefinite extensions without additional landowner approval. Another article in the series, "Rush to Drill for Natural Gas Creates Conflicts With Mortgages" , describes the mortgage problems that such leases can create.  Some banks refuse to issue mortgages on properties subject to these leases.  Many mortgages require permission from the lender before they sign a lease; signing without permission can put a homeowner in instant default. Many gas well drilling leases will permit the gas company to operate in ways that violate rules in the mortgage.

An archive of more than 1,000 Pennsylvania gas leases can be viewed online on the New York Times website here. The archive can be used to compare lease terms and evaluate costs and benefits. An archive of documents relating to the problems with mortgages caused by gas leases is available here.

According to John Quigley, former Secretary of Pennsylvania's Department of Conservation and Natural Resources, "at least seven million acres -- 25 percent of the state’s land area -- has been leased for drilling. About 4,000 Marcellus wells have been drilled in Pennsylvania so far, and over the next several decades, tens of thousands -- maybe hundreds of thousands -- of wells will be drilled."

Landowners who have signed -- or who are asked to sign -- natural gas well drilling leases should be aware of these potential problems, and have the leases and other real estate documents reviewed by counsel.

Chrin Landfill Agrees to Pay $114,00 DEP Fine for Odor & Air Violations

DEP Logo copy Chrin Brothers Sanitary Landfill has agreed to pay a $114,000 fine to the Pa. Department of Environmental Protection for odor, air pollution and waste management violations, according to an article in the Express-Times (Easton, PA).  It also agreed to withdraw an appeal of the fine which had been pending before the state Environmental Hearing Board. (We reported that appeal in our post of January 31.) In addition to paying the fine, Chrin also agreed to improve its waste and odor management practices. According to the article by reporter Colin McEvoy, "Chrin said the landfill will adopt new off-site odor-minimization procedures and implement twice-daily patrols to monitor the landfill perimeter for potential odors. The company will also instruct its haulers on proper management of particularly odorous loads to avoid problems during disposal, he said, and will deploy a rapid-response team to inspect those loads whenever they are accepted."  Chrin also agreed to give up any further appeal rights.

Energy Department To Revamp Hydraulic Fracturing Rules for Natural Gas Extraction

The New York Times reports that the Department of Energy, acting on orders from President Obama, has established an expert panel to revise safety and environmental standards for hydraulic fracturing (so-called "fracking"). Hydraulic fracturing involves high-pressure injection of fluids into underground shale formations to break open natural gas pockets as a technique for extraction of natural gas from deep wells. The Obama Administration's new energy policy, announced on March 30, 2011 at Georgetown University, significantly relies on increased natural gas production. Steven Chu, Energy Secretary, has requested the expert panel to issue immediate recommendations within 90 days, and a more comprehensive set of safety and environmental standards within three months.  The expert panel chairman is John Deutch, a former director of the Central Intelligence Agency and deputy defense secretary, and current director of Cheniere Energy, which operates a natural gas terminal and pipelines.

Hydraulic fracturing pours millions of gallons of toxic chemicals into the ground and into wastewater treatment systems, which in some cases are not designed to treat all of the contaminants. The New York Times article refers to "numerous documented cases" in which fracking fluids leaked into aquifers and contaminated drinking water.

Other members of the panel include former PADEP secretary Kathleen McGinty; Stephen Holditch, chairman of the department of petroleum engineering at Texas A&M University; Fred Krupp, president of the Environmental Defense Fund; Susan Tierney, former assistant secretary of energy for policy and Massachusetts secretary of environmental affairs; Daniel Yergin, chairman of I. H. S. Cambridge Energy Research Associates and author of “The Prize: The Epic Quest for Oil, Money and Power,” and Mark Zoback, a Stanford geophysics professor.

Chrin Brothers Landfill Appeals PADEP Fine for Air and Waste Violations

PA Coat of Arms UPDATE:  Chrin Brothers has agreed to withdraw its appeal and to pay a fine of $114,000 and undertake new measures to minimize odors and air pollution problems. See our September 20, 2011 post.

Chrin Brothers, Inc. has appealed the December 28, 2009 fine of $187,500 imposed by the Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Protection (PADEP) for air pollution and waste management violations at its landfill. See our post of December 28, 2009 for more details on the landfill facility and the PADEP fine. As we noted in our post, appeals of PADEP civil penalty assessments are filed with the Environmental Hearing Board ("EHB"). 

Detailed information about the Chrin Landfill appeal can be followed at the EHB website case information page and the docket sheet for the appeal. Standard scheduling orders have been issued in the case.

EPA Releases 2009 Environmental Compliance Enforcement Action Record

EPA has released its 2009 Compliance Enforcement Actionsrecord. EPA's site also includes an interactive mapping tool which allows the public to search and identify federal environmental enforcement actions in any geographic area.  The site allows searches by environmental media (air, water, land and cross-media) and by location. Significant enforcement actions taken by EPA in 2009 in the Lehigh Valley included a multi-facility enforcement action against several Lehigh County municipal sewage facilities for sewer overflow violations. Also noteworthy was the criminal prosecution of Atlantic States Cast Iron Pipe Co., Phillipsburg, NJ in the longest federal trial in environmental crimes history. The corporation and four managers were convicted of engaging in an eight-year conspiracy to pollute the air and Delaware River in violation of the federal Clean Air and Clean Water Acts, expose its employees to dangerous conditions, and impede and obstruct federal regulatory and criminal investigations.In 2009 (FY), EPA concluded civil and criminal enforcement actions requiring polluters to invest an estimated $5.4 billion to reduce pollution, clean up contaminated land and water, achieve compliance and fund environmentally beneficial projects. Civil and criminal defendants committed to reduce pollution by approximately 570 million pounds annually once all required controls are fully implemented.

EPA's top Clean Air Act enforcement actions during FY 2009 reduced approximately 230 million pounds of sulfur oxides (SOx), nitrogen oxides (NOx) and particulate matter (PM) per year when all the required pollution controls are in place, resulting in estimated health benefits of between $4 billion to $9.8 billion. See more on civil enforcement.

In FY 2009, EPA opened 387 new environmental crime cases, the largest number of criminal case initiations in five years. EPA also launched the Fugitive Web Sitein fiscal year 2009, which assisted in the capture or surrender of five fugitives. See more on criminal enforcement.

EPA obtained $371 million from settlements with responsible parties to reimburse EPA for its past expenditures for cleaning up Superfund sites. This is the highest cost recovered ever for the Superfund program. See more on the Superfund program.

In FY 2009, EPA concluded 51 enforcement actions against federal agencies and federal facility contractors for alleged violations of environmental laws. These actions will prevent more than 13 million pounds of pollutants from being released into the environment. See more on federal facilities.

In addition, this year EPA began major initiatives to remediate pollution of the Chesapeake Bayand provide information about enforcement of the Clean Water Act, the Clean Air Actand the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA).

PADEP Grants Chrin Landfill 10-Year Permit Renewal; Imposes Fine and New Conditions

Chrin landfill  The Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Protection (PADEP) granted Chrin Brothers landfill in Williams Township, Pennsylvania a 10-year renewal of its municipal waste landfill permit, according to an Express-Times (Easton, PA) newspaper article linked here.  While granting the landfill a renewal of its operating permit, DEP also imposed a $187,500 fine for prior violations for off-site odors, nuisance minimization problems and insufficient landfill gas management. PADEP also imposed additional permit conditions, including the requirement to install temporary capping measures that will cover about 60 percent of the landfill within two years. The PADEP facility eFACTS file on the landfill can be viewed by clicking here. The file includes permit information, history of inspections and violations, and other pertinent data.  

The PADEP's decision renewing the permit and imposing the fine and additional conditions can be appealed to the Pa. Environmental Hearing Board.

UPDATE:  Chrin Brothers, Inc. has appealed the PADEP fine to the Pa. Environmental Hearing Board.   For more information, see our post of January 31, 2010.